
API Security Trends 2026

Judith Kahrer
· 4 min readKey Takeaways
AI and MCP will keep reshaping IAM strategies in 2026, pushing organizations toward faster, more dynamic authorization models.
Machine identities — AI agents, autonomous applications, and their operators — will become a central IAM focus, requiring new approaches to trust, onboarding, and authorization.
Traditional PAM/IGA processes with manual approvals are too slow for autonomous applications; access control will shift toward runtime, continuously evaluated permissions.
OAuth integrations will mature, with more organizations adopting workload identities, token exchange, and JWT-assertion-grant to reduce reliance on client secrets and enable least-privilege, cross-domain access.
EU regulation will shape IAM alongside AI: Verifiable Credentials and the European Identity Wallet move closer to real-world adoption, while PSD3/PSR/FIDA will reshape financial authentication, including stronger and more accessible Strong Customer Authentication (SCA).
Broken authorization will remain the leading cause of API security exploits in 2026, largely due to communication gaps between infrastructure, development, and business teams rather than a lack of awareness.
On this page
Looking back at Nordic API’s Platform Summit that took place last October, 2025 was the year of AI and MCP. Both will remain hot topics to a great extent even in 2026, and they already bring some good changes as they are forcing organizations to rethink their IAM strategies, alter their frames of mind, and improve security.Â
AI will continue to drive IAM in 2026. I'm convinced that its impact on authorization will be long-lasting. With that in mind, I believe 2026 holds some exciting trends worth watching.
Machine Identities Will Take Center Stage
In the context of AI and autonomous applications, it will become increasingly important to authenticate and authorize machines, AI agents, and their human operators, if any. Consequently, machine IAM will get quite some attention in 2026. Questions like how to trust arbitrary applications whose code organizations can't control, how to onboard them, and how to authorize requests will be hot topics.
Simply strengthening machine identities will not be enough. AI demands speed and dynamics in authorization decisions - particularly for applications. Authorization will need to be fast and secure.Â
Access Control Will Concentrate on Speed
Conventional Privileged Access Management (PAM) and Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) solutions struggle to meet modern requirements for provisioning access for machines or applications in a timely manner. IAM simply cannot rely anymore on processes with manual steps and approvals, where it may take weeks to onboard applications and provision access. Autonomous applications require autonomous decisions.Â
Admin-time authorization will need to focus on setting up the trust and defining the rules for how to retrieve permissions for applications and users dynamically during runtime. Runtime authorization will need to continuously evaluate permissions.Â
Permissions can change quickly depending on events at other parts of a system architecture. Therefore, analysing and sharing data and signals between components will be important for the success of IAM. This is a great chance for the adoption of certain standards.Â
OAuth Integrations Will Mature
Along with the focus on machine identities, more organizations will start to strengthen OAuth client credentials. More organizations will utilize their infrastructure, such as workload identities for client authentication. However, as with usernames and passwords for humans, it will take decades to get rid of client secrets or their equivalent to authenticate applications. At least, 2026 will spark off some initiatives in the right direction. With MCP dictating an OAuth profile, organizations will become more aware of the best practices. In 2026, OAuth integrations will improve beyond strong client credentials: More organizations will make use of token exchange for least privileged access and of the JWT-assertion-grant protocol to cross security boundaries. How to enable Single Sign-On for users across trust domains and federate authorization without compromising security is one of the challenges to solve in 2026.
While AI and the resulting requirements will dominate IAM to a great extent, some regulations, namely eIDAS and PSD3, will also have an impact during 2026.
Verifiable Credentials Will Begin to ShineÂ
There is quite some work happening in the European Union for the rollout of Verifiable Credentials and a European Identity Wallet. As the deadline is getting closer and the results get more and more reliable in 2026, organizations that are far-sighted will prepare for the change. Verifiable Credentials enable a new, convenient, and cheap method for identity verification and authentication for a large part of the population in Europe. 2026 is the year when things will start to feel real.
Open Finance Will Disrupt the Finance SectorÂ
As with PSD2, which created quite some excitement and anxiety in the banking sector, PSD3, PSR, and FIDA will have a similar impact on more actors in the financial industry. It's likely that the regulations will be finalized during the first half of 2026. So, 2026 is the time to have a closer look and prepare for the impact. The regulations promise more harmonization and stronger customer protection. Among other things, PSD3 strengthens Strong Customer Authentication (SCA). For example, SCA implementations also need to be accessible to all users, including people with disabilities, elderly people, or people with less technical skills. Sounds good and human in my opinion.
Weak API Security Will Continue
Companies will continue to make mistakes because there will still be gaps in the understanding between infrastructure teams, application developers, API developers, and the business. Such misunderstandings, together with other implementation flaws, represent the main threat to API access control. The increase in automated API attacks that target broken authorization adds to the risk. Consequently, broken authorization is the area where most exploits will occur.Â
Organizations need to proactively improve their API security implementations to avoid broken authorizations from the beginning. The ability to communicate and convey business requirements, and translate them into technical implementations while providing seamless user experience (including developer experience) and keeping up with security will remain important for the success of an IAM program.Â
Refine Your API Security in 2026
IAM for APIs and API clients remains a complex topic. In fact, the trend is towards more complexity, which requires more sophisticated building blocks such as non-human identities. The best practices for API access control and AI agents are going to be more relevant than ever in 2026. I believe that the new year will bring some exciting improvements regarding IAM. Who knows, maybe 2026 is the year that will rewrite the list of top API vulnerabilities and contain fewer authorization problems?!
Related resources
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly counts as a "machine identity," and how is it different from a service account?
A machine identity broadly covers any non-human entity that needs to authenticate and be authorized — service accounts, workloads, AI agents, and applications. Traditional service accounts are typically static, long-lived credentials tied to a specific system. Modern machine identities, by contrast, are increasingly dynamic and short-lived, tied to workload identity or runtime context rather than a fixed, hardcoded secret.
What is a workload identity, and how does it eliminate the need for client secrets?
A workload identity lets an application or service prove who it is based on its runtime environment — such as its cloud platform, container, or deployment context — rather than a static credential like a client secret or API key. This removes a common attack surface: there's no long-lived secret sitting in code or config files that could be leaked or stolen.
What is the JWT-assertion-grant protocol, and when would an organization use it?
It's an OAuth 2.0 extension grant type that allows a signed JWT to be exchanged for an access token, often used to cross trust boundaries — for example, letting a service in one security domain assert its identity to obtain a token valid in another domain, without a traditional interactive login.
How does token exchange actually enable least-privileged access?
Token exchange lets a service take a broader-scoped token it received and swap it for a new, more narrowly scoped token before calling a downstream service. This means each hop in a chain of service calls only carries the minimum permissions needed for that specific step, rather than propagating the same broad access everywhere.